Comments
Comment #22 Kevin Tiernan Logan @ 2023-12-13 16:33
As Editor I decide to accept the submission for publication in ing.grid Authors, please upload the latex folder as zip archive
Invited Review Comment #21 Michaela Lestakova @ 2023-12-13 16:31
I would
like to thanks the authors for addressing my suggestions.
I am hereby
recommending the submission for publication.
Comment #20 Izadora Silva Pimenta @ 2023-12-13 16:29
Thanks to the reviewers and editors for valuable feedback. We will submit the updated version.
Comment #19 Kevin Tiernan Logan @ 2023-12-13 16:28
As the responsible topical editor, I would like to thank both reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback. After consideration of the comments, I advise the authors to revise both the descriptor and the repository according to the suggestions provided in the reviews. After completion, the new version of the descriptor including the revisions may be submitted by the authors for further consideration.
Invited Review Comment #18 Michaela Lestakova @ 2023-12-13 16:25
The paper
is a valuable contribution to the field of RDM. However, I have some remarks.
Major
revisions
-
The
storyline is hard to follow
-
It
should be clarified whether the submission is intended to be a research article
or a software descriptor. The contents point to the latter, but it says
research article in the submitted file. If the submission is intended as a
software descriptor, instructions on how to contribute to the project should be
included in the repository. If it is intended as a research article, I would
expect a thorough evaluation of results and much fewer implementation details.
Minor
revisions
-
The
abstract should end with a short outlook or implication of the presented
results.
-
Spelling
mistake on line 25
Therefore,
I suggest that the authors revise and resubmit the manuscript.