Skip to main content
Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis: A Critique of the Signifying Reason: Is Wittgenstein’s a Perspicuous Representation

Article

Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis: A Critique of the Signifying Reason: Is Wittgenstein’s a Perspicuous Representation

Abstract

The author analyzes the philosophical relationships between Wittgenstein and Freud, trying to explain the reasons for the apparent ambivalence of the former towards the latter. In fact, Wittgenstein seems to be at once an admirer of Freud (he considered practising psychoanalysis himself as a psychiatrist) and a bitter critic of his scientific claims. The author explains these contradictions with Wittgenstein’s complex, essentially negative, attitude towards modern science. Hence his criticism of Freud as too much of a “scientist” on the one hand, and his appreciation of Freud’s endeavor to “unbind mental knots” on the other, a strength that he considered akin to his own philosophical project as illustrated in the Philosophische Untersuchungen. In fact, both Wittgenstein’s philosophy and psychoanalysis contain something the author calls a Critique of the Signifying Reason.

Keywords:

  • Keyword: Cantor's Proof
  • Keyword: Goethian Science
  • Keyword: Linguistic Games
  • Keyword: the Real
  • Keyword: Wittgenstein & Freud

How to Cite:

Benvenuto, S., (2014) “Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis: A Critique of the Signifying Reason: Is Wittgenstein’s a Perspicuous Representation”, The European Journal of Psychoanalysis 1(2), 1–10.

Rights: Incopyright

Downloads

Downloads are not available for this article.

Share

Author details

Downloads

Downloads are not available for this article.

Information

  • Published on 2014-11-18
  • Pages: 1–10
  • Original Publication: The European Journal of Psychoanalysis
  • Original ISSN: 2284-1059
  • License

Metrics

  • Views: 3

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTeX

File Checksums

(MD5)

File Checksums are not available for this article.