<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Image and Imagination in Wittgenstein and Freud</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Carlo Sini</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>The Speaking Lion
</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Mladen Dolar</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Freud’s Dangerous Pupil
</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Hannes Nykänen</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>A Critique of the Meaningful Reason. </strong><strong>Is Wittgenstein’s a Perspicuous Representation of Freud’s thought?</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Sergio Benvenuto</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Philosophy as Therapy.   </strong><strong>On some Analogies between Wittgenstein and Freud</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Davide Sparti</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Touchy subjects:</strong></p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>A ‘Freudian’ Wittgenstein, a ‘Wittgensteinian’ Freud</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Joel Backström</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Back to the Future of Illusion. </strong><strong>Where Freud and Wittgenstein meet without knowing it</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Pfaller</p>
&nbsp;
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Telling the Truth about Truth. </strong><strong>The Philosopher’s Frame and the Analyst’s Speech</strong></p>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Federico Leoni</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
The author stresses the extent to which analytic literature represses the issue of money and how its significance to the analytical relationship ought instead to be analyzed. Starting from a widespread fantasy among analysands, where the analyst is felt to be a prostitute, the author expands upon the limits of the analytical setting, which has been suffering from a sort of phobia of the gift since the days of Freud. To the concept of psychoanalysis “of the answering” by the analytical establishment, the author opposes a more living concept of “psychoanalysis of the questioning”.
<h3>Abstract</h3>
The author stresses the extent to which analytic literature represses the issue of money and how its significance to the analytical relationship ought instead to be analyzed. Starting from a widespread fantasy among analysands, where the analyst is felt to be a prostitute, the author expands upon the limits of the analytical setting, which has been suffering from a sort of phobia of the gift since the days of Freud. To the concept of psychoanalysis “of the answering” by the analytical establishment, the author opposes a more living concept of “psychoanalysis of the questioning”.
<h3>Abstract</h3>
The author stresses the extent to which analytic literature represses the issue of money and how its significance to the analytical relationship ought instead to be analyzed. Starting from a widespread fantasy among analysands, where the analyst is felt to be a prostitute, the author expands upon the limits of the analytical setting, which has been suffering from a sort of phobia of the gift since the days of Freud. To the concept of psychoanalysis “of the answering” by the analytical establishment, the author opposes a more living concept of “psychoanalysis of the questioning”.