Options
research-article

The correlation between unemployment and economic growth in Latin America – Okun's law estimates by country

Authors
  • Maria Sylvina PORRAS‐ARENA (Faculty of Business and Economic Sciences, University of Valladolid)
  • Ángel L. MARTÍN‐ROMÁN (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Administration, University of the Republic, Uruguay)

Abstract

The authors question the validity of Okun's law in Latin America in this paper. Based on several econometric models, they show that fluctuations in economic activity have a lesser impact on unemployment rates in Latin American countries than in other, more advanced economies. Instead of stimulus policies focused on reducing unemployment in general, these countries need targeted policies that encourage job creation in specific sectors. That being said, the unemployment—output ratio differs from one Latin American country to another. Where the ratio is weak or non‐existent, cyclical variations adversely affect the quality of employment – another aspect that must also be addressed by economic policy.

Keywords: Okun's law, Economic growth, unemployment

How to Cite:

PORRAS‐ARENA, M. & MARTÍN‐ROMÁN, Á., (2023) “The correlation between unemployment and economic growth in Latin America – Okun's law estimates by country”, ILR Test Journal 162(2), 171–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12398

Rights: © the authors 2021 Journal translation and compilation © International Labour Organization 2023

Downloads:
Download XML
Download PDF

2 Views

2 Downloads

Published on
2023-06-02

Peer Reviewed

License

 

References

Abril, Juan Carlos, Hugo DanielFerullo, and Andrea GaínzaCórdoba. 1998. Estimación de la relación de Okun: Argentina 1980–1996. Tucumán: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.

Arias Cubillo, Eilyn, Ana Cecilia KikutValverde, and Jorge MadrigalBadilla. 2002. “Estimación de la ley de Okun para Costa Rica”, technical note DIE/03–2002–NT. San José: Central Bank of Costa Rica.

Balakrishnan, Ravi, MitaliDas, and PrakashKannan. 2010. “Unemployment Dynamics during Recessions and Recoveries: Okun's Law and Beyond”. In World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth, 69–107. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Ball, Laurence, DavideFurceri, DanielLeigh, and PrakashLoungani. 2019. “Does One Law Fit All? Cross-Country Evidence on Okun's Law”. Open Economies Review  30 (5): 841–874.

Ball, Laurence, DanielLeigh, and PrakashLoungani. 2017. “Okun's Law: Fit at 50?”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking  49 (7): 1413–1441.

Belmonte, Ana, and ClementePolo. 2004. “Formulaciones de la ley de Okun y resultados para España”. In Estudios en homenaje a Luis Ángel Rojo. Volumen 1: políticas, mercados e instituciones económicas, edited by CarlosSebastián, José PérezFernández and Pedro TeddedeLorca, 294–294. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

Blanchard, Olivier. 1997. Macroeconomics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Briceño, Marilú, GenninnaDávila, and MaribelRojas. 2016. “Estimación de la Ley de Okun: evidencia empírica para Ecuador, América Latina y el Mundo”. Revista Económica  1 (1): 35–45.

Cazes, Sandrine, SameerKhatiwada, and MiguelMalo. 2012. “Employment Protection and Collective Bargaining: Beyond the Deregulation Agenda”, Employment Working Paper No. 133. Geneva: ILO.

Cazes, Sandrine, SherVerick, and Fares AlHussami. 2013. “Why Did Unemployment Respond so Differently to the Global Financial Crisis Across Countries? Insights from Okun's Law”. IZA Journal of Labor Policy  2 (10): 1–18.

Del Rio, Ana. 1999. “Agregación temporal y Filtro Hodrick–Prescott”, Tesina CEMFI No. 9910. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI).

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2020. “Report on the Economic Impact of Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19) on Latin America and the Caribbean”  . Santiago.

Franco Martín, Angie2017. Evidencia de la Ley de Okun para Colombia, Chile y Argentina: 1980–2014. Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia. https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/handle/10983/14428.

Garavito, Cecilia. 2003. “La ley de Okun en el Perú: 1970–2000”. Economía  26 (51–52): 157–196.

Gil-Alana, Luis A., MarinkoSkare, and BlasevicBuric. 2020. “Testing Okun's Law: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations Using Fractional Integration”. Applied Economics  52 (5): 459–474.

González Anaya, José Antonio. 2002. “Labor Market Flexibility in Thirteen Latin American Countries and the United States: Revisiting and Expanding Okun Coefficients”, Working Paper No. 136. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Hamilton, James D.2017. “Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick–Prescott Filter”, NBER Working Paper No. 23429. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Herwartz, Helmut, and AnnekatrinNiebuhr. 2011. “Growth, Unemployment and Labour Market Institutions: Evidence from a Cross-Section of EU Regions”. Applied Economics  43 (30): 4663–4676.

ILO. 1993. Resolution concerning statistics of employment in the informal sector  . Fifteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians.

ILO. 2013. Measuring Informality: A Statistical Manual on the Informal Sector and Informal Employment  . Geneva.

Islas-Camargo, Alejandro, and Willy W.Cortez. 2018. “Can the Informal Sector Affect the Relationship Between Unemployment and Output? An Analysis of the Mexican Case”. CEPAL Review  126 (December): 137–153.

Ismihan, Mustafa. 2010. “A New Framework for Output-Unemployment Relationship: Okun's Law Revisited”, MPRA Paper 28135. Munich: University Library of Munich.

Kapsos, Steven. 2005. “The Employment Intensity of Growth: Trends and Macroeconomic Determinants”, Employment Strategy Papers 12. Geneva: ILO.

Karfakis, Costas, ConstantinosKatrakilidis, and EftychiaTsanana. 2014. “Does Output Predict Unemployment? A Look at Okun's Law in Greece”. International Labour Review  153 (3): 421–433.

Kaufman, Roger T.1988. “An International Comparison of Okun's Laws”. Journal of Comparative Economics  12 (2): 182–203.

Knotek, Edward. 2007. “How Useful is Okun's law?”. Economic Review  92 (Q IV): 73–103.

Liquitaya Briceño, José D.2005. “El desempleo urbano y los ciclos de la producción en México”. Denarius  11 (November): 231–261.

Loría Díaz de Guzmán, Eduardo Gilberto, Emmanuel Alejandro RamírezGuerra, and EmmanuelSalas. 2015. “La Ley de Okun y la flexibilidad laboral en México: un análisis de cointegración, 1997Q3–2014Q1”. Contaduría y Administración  60 (3): 631–650.

Magariños, Néstor Adrián. 2018. Un análisis conceptual y empírico de la Ley de Okun para Argentina. Trabajo de Grado de la Licenciatura en Economía. Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur.

Martín-Román, Ángel L.2022. “Beyond the Added-Worker and the Discouraged-Worker Effects: The Entitled-Worker Effect”. Economic Modelling  110 (May): 105812.

Martín-Román, Ángel L., JaimeCuéllar-Martín, and AlfonsoMoral. 2020. “Labor Supply and the Business Cycle: The ‘Bandwagon Worker Effect’”. Papers in Regional Science  99 (6): 1607–1642.

Moosa, Imad A.1997. “A Cross-Country Comparison of Okun's Coefficient”. Journal of Comparative Economics  24 (3): 335–356.

Neffa, Julio C.2008. “Empleo informal, trabajo no registrado y trabajo precario: Dimensiones teóricas y conceptuales”. In La informalidad, la precariedad laboral y el empleo no registrado en la provincia de Buenos Aires, edited by Julio C.Neffa, first edition, 15–139. La Plata and Buenos Aires: Labour Ministry of Buenos Aires Province and Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones Laborales (CEIL–PIETTE).

Okun, Arthur M.1962. “Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance”. In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, 98–104. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.

Páez Cortés, Jessica Natalia. 2013. “Una Revisión de la Ley de Okun para Latinoamérica”. Research paper for the Master's degree in applied economics. Cali: Universidad del Valle.

Paldam, Martin. 1987. “How Much Does One Percent of Growth Change the Unemployment Rate? A Study of 17 OECD Countries. 1948–1985”. European Economic Review  31 (1–2): 306–313.

Perman, Roger, and ChristopheTavera. 2005 “A Cross–Country Analysis of the Okun's Law Coefficient Convergence in Europe”. Applied Economics  37 (21): 2501–2513.

Perman, Roger, and ChristopheTavera. 2007. “Testing for Convergence of the Okun's Law Coefficient in Europe”. Empirica  34 (1): 45–61.

Pizzo, Alessandra. 2020. “Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Okun's Law in Latin America and the Caribbean”, Employment Working Paper No. 252. Geneva: ILO.

Porras-Arena, M. Sylvina, and Ángel L.Martín-Román. 2019. “Self-Employment and the Okun's Law”. Economic Modelling  77 (March): 253–265.

Rojas Manzo, Susana M.2019. “Estimación de la ley de Okun para la Economía Mexicana desde un enfoque panel, 2005–2016”. El Semestre de las Especializaciones  1 (1): 69–93.

Schnabel, Gert. 2002. “Output Trends and Okun's Law”, BIS Working Papers No. 111. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

Schüler, Yves S.2018. “On the Cyclical Properties of Hamilton's Regression Filter”, Discussion Paper No. 03/2018. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.

Sögner, Leopold, and AlfredStiassny. 2002. “An Analysis on the Structural Stability of Okun's Law: A Cross-Country Study”. Applied Economics  34 (14): 1775–1787.

Tokman, Victor. 2004. Una voz en el camino. Empleo y equidad en América Latina: 40 años de búsqueda. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Tombolo, Guilherme Alexandre, and Marcos MinoruHasegawa. 2014. “Okun's Law: Evidence for the Brazilian Economy”, MPRA Paper No. 54766. Munich: University Library of Munich.

Velásquez Pinto, Mario Daniel. 2014. “Análisis de la protección ante el desempleo en América Latina”, Macroeconomics of Development No. 154. Santiago: ECLAC.

Weller, Jürgen. 2016. “La evolución de la productividad y el empleo agropecuario en América Latina entre 2002 y 2012”. In Brechas y transformaciones: la evolución del empleo agropecuario en América Latina, edited by JürgenWeller, 31–112. Santiago: ECLAC.